Food industry requests single front-of-pack labelling system
The Australian Food and Grocery Council (AFGC) is calling on governments to support a single front of pack labelling system that includes information about energy, fat, sugar, salt and serve sizes.
AFGC Chief Executive, Kate Carnell, said there is already a front of pack labelling system in the market place that provides this information.
The Daily Intake Guide is on more than 1100 products and is used by major manufacturers and retailers including Woolworths, Coles, IGA, Franklins, ALDI and McDonalds. It is being progressively rolled out and will be on most products over the next two years.
The Daily Intake Guide approach is the system preferred by the European Union, following a great deal of research into consumer understanding, the AFGC said. This system was adapted for Australia, bringing it into line with Australian nutrition information panels, which will remain mandatory on all products.
“It only makes sense that the government should adopt the system that is already being used by consumers everyday to make decisions on putting together a balanced diet,” Ms Carnell suggested.
Two-thirds of people in a recent Newspoll survey of 1200 people said they found it easy to understand and more than one third reported using it to make purchasing decisions.
The AFGC, which represents Australian food and beverage manufacturers, is strongly recommending the final decision on front of pack labelling to be a part of the overall review on labelling currently being conducted as part of the COAG initiatives.
“It is essential that labelling be national, consistent and understood by the consumers. The purpose of the COAG initiative is to provide a holistic approach to labelling and avoid the problems that have been caused by piecemeal approaches to decision making in the past,” Ms Carnell explained.
The issue of food labelling remains a major talking point, with legislation likely to be drawn up before the end of the year. Either the Daily Intake Guide or ‘traffic light labelling‘ – which is has the support of some prominent health and consumer groups including Choice and the Cancer Council – is expected to become mandatory on the front of food packaging.
Chinese distributor places first order for Meluka’s tea tree honey Order follows receipt of a th...
The Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation (the Forum) met on 16 Augus...
A number of agriculture and farming representative groups have today expressed disappointment over t...
Newly launched Co-Lab Pantry is an online retail hub offering high-end pantry staples, meals, drin...
Beetroot extract, matcha green tea and ginger are some of the novel ingredients headlining Merlo Co...
A new study has found young Australians are more likely to engage in risky alcohol consumption if th...
Kellogg Company unveiled its ambitious next generation commitment to address global food security a...
A study into seafood fraud has found, on average, one in five pieces of seafood tested worldwide wer...
This “timely” press release follows the appearance of Kate of SBS Insight the other night trying to defend the AFGC’s position on food labelling. Unfortunately, both Kate and the woman from Kelloggs came off very second best. The efforts of the food industry to undermine and cloud the issue through deliberate misdirection is appalling. Parents (of which I am one) prefer the traffic light system, rather than the more confusing DIG labels. Traffic lights make it simple, clear and obvious. It’s too easy for FMCG companies to hide begind DIG labels by manipulating serving sizes. And for Kate to suggest that customers already prefer the DIG system because it’s in use now is misleading. Just because it’s out there and companies are using it, doesn’t mean consumers want it or use it. I, for one, ignore it, and prefer to read the nutritionals and ingredients to determine what’s REALLY in the food, and often that is misleading. I know from many of mums that we hope that COAG makes the right decision and cleans up this mess and introduces the traffic system, and doesn’t succumb to pressure from the AFGC. The fact that Kate is also on the committe is a huge conflict of interest so no surprise (yet again) if the food industry muscles to get their way!